Showing posts with label SANTA CLARA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SANTA CLARA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 12, 2019

Controversial Silicon Valley Divorce Lawyer Implicated in Stolen Valor Scandal: Veterans Prove Attorney Brad Baugh Military Service Claims Fraudulent

Members of the Santa Clara County legal community say that for more than 20 years, family law attorney Bradford Baugh boasted of his military service and heroics in the Vietnam War. But government records and other sources, including this 1968 yearbook entry, have proven the claims false, according to a veterans organization. 

An investigation by a "stolen valor" veterans research organization has determined that prominent Santa Clara County divorce lawyer Bradford Baugh's claim to military service in the Vietnam War era is not true. According to attorney ethics law, the demonstrably false claim constitutes an act of "moral turpitude." 

California Business and Professions Code § 6106 prohibits acts involving dishonesty or corruption, "whether the act is committed in the course of his relations as an attorney or otherwise." The law has been well established since at least 1992, according to the State Bar Compendium of Professional Responsibility, a directory of past disciplinary decisions against lawyers. 

The veterans group said they will ask the State Bar to disbar the controversial attorney, and are closely reviewing the case for possible referral to the U.S. Department of Justice for criminal prosecution under the Stolen Valor Act

Baugh reportedly promoted his status as a veteran to generate business, according to current and former clients. Court appointed experts who worked on cases involving Baugh said the attorney would also boast about the high number of enemy fatalities he was personally responsible for during his service in Vietnam. Several experts interpreted Baugh's unusual recitation of his Vietnam enemy death count as a veiled threat to ensure the testimony of experts was favorable to his clients. 

In addition to exposure for criminal charges under the Stolen Valor Act, making false claims of military service to generate business or investors can also result in civil liability.  

Clients, former clients, court employees and others in the legal community who contributed to this report asked not to be named for fear of retaliation by the well-connected attorney. 

Thursday, August 4, 2016

Controversial Attorney Brad Baugh Whistleblower Leak: Winnov Founder Olivier Garbe Divorce Battle

Attorney Garrett Dailey Controversy: Whistleblower Leak - Marriage of Dong and Garbe - Winnov Inc Olivier Garbe - Judge Mary Ann Grilli Santa Clara County Superior Court – Attorney Bradford Baugh, Baugh & Amini, 1550 The Alameda, Suite 155, San Jose CA 95126 - Garrett C. Dailey SBN 76180 Attorney at Law 2915 McClure Street Oakland CA 94609 - Sixth District Court of Appeal California San Jose
Silicon Valley divorce attorney Bradford Baugh. 
The past due attorney fee invoice embedded at the bottom of this post is from the high-conflict Silicon Valley divorce case between Winnov Inc Founder Olivier Garbe and Diana Dong. The case is being heard by controversial Santa Clara County Family Court Judge Mary Ann Grilli.   

San Jose divorce attorney Brad Baugh represents Garbe in the trial court, and prominent appellate attorney Garrett C. Dailey represents Garbe on appeal. Dong has been represented by a string of attorneys or been self-represented due to denials of motions requesting attorney fee funds.  


Baugh is connected to a number of high-profile, high-conflict Santa Clara County divorce cases, including Richard and Laura Beauchesne, Janet and Kyle Bowers, Susan and Robert Bassi, and Evan and Violet Brooks. 


Court watchdogs contend that Santa Clara County Superior Court case files show Baugh deliberately generates conflict between divorcing couples who have substantial assets and income, unnecessarily drags cases out for years, and in the process churns exorbitant legal fees.  Whistleblowers also allege that Baugh fails to disclose conflicts of interest with judges, referees, special masters, judge pro tems, and child custody evaluators, who Baugh has had personal, social, or professional relationships with for more than 20 years. 


Court case file statistical sampling and anecdotal evidence suggest that Baugh obtains favorable outcomes for his clients at a statistically improbable level. Whistleblowers attribute the attorneys unusual success to alleged unethical conduct, bad faith litigation tactics, serial moral turpitude misconduct, and corruption within his network of judges and associates.